online: Adding auxiliary digi data to STS digi QA

• The auxiliary data objects from unpackers are stored in a temporary data structure AuxDigiUnpack (TODO: Dummy classes for DigiQa, execute the QA inside the Reco::RunUnpacker function)
• The option "--aux-data" is added to force saving the auxiliary data in unpackers (now is used only by sts::Unpack)
• STS digi QA: histograms for channel vs. e-link are added for different modules

added Online QA labels

requested review from @fweig

assigned to @fweig

changed title from online: Adding auxilary digi data to STS digi QA to online: Adding auxiliary digi data to STS digi QA

changed the description

@a.toia I passed the auxiliary digis to the QA module and added the channel vs. e-link histograms. Adding the time distributions is a little bit more tricky challenge. It refers to the idea of @p.-a.loizeau of storing histograms vs. time-slice start time.

@p.-a.loizeau I am going to try adding the support of histogram evolution with time with the next commit to this merge request. It will be the first iteration, where the histograms will be plotted vs. the number of the time slice processed. Later this can be replaced with the time axis, as you proposed.

Dear @d.smith, @fweig, @v.friese,

you have been identified as code owner of at least one file which was changed with this merge request.

Please check the changes and approve them or request changes.

added CodeOwners label

changed the description

added 1 commit

• 21a8480b - online:

Compare with previous version

Thanks Sergey, looks good!

some instructions how to use it from tsa:

https://redmine.cbm.gsi.de/projects/mcbm/wiki/STS_online_monitor_QA

added 1 commit

• ef79a93a - online:

Compare with previous version

added 1 commit

• fdaebcb5 - online:

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

As long as we do not have a good solution for the time, can we add two simple histo: for each Address:

• TH1 with event miss flag (0 or 1)
• TH2 channel (int, 0-2048) vs event miss flag (int, 0-1) In this way we can at least count the data loss per address and per channel

added 1 commit

• 6c2761d4 - Online STS Digi QA: profile digi with missed event flag vs. number of channels and address

Compare with previous version

ok, that's fine too!

@fweig could you please merge this? @p.-a.loizeau the dependencies vs TS ID will be introduced in a separate merge request

resolved all threads

mentioned in merge request !1861 (merged)

added 12 commits

• 6c2761d4...ee48547d - 10 commits from branch computing:master
• b6adbdb1 - online:
• 4efa5d41 - Online STS Digi QA: profile digi with missed event flag vs. number of channels and address

Compare with previous version

approved this merge request

added 6 commits

• 4efa5d41...5df71b2d - 4 commits from branch computing:master
• 37d21a54 - online:
• f1d209ec - Online STS Digi QA: profile digi with missed event flag vs. number of channels and address

Compare with previous version

enabled an automatic merge when the pipeline for f1d209ec succeeds

merged