mTof mapping 2024 for old style and online unpackers
Of interest to @v.friese @n.herrmann
- Offline part to be cross-checked, from printout 1:1 equivalent but would need to be checked at teh Digi level to make sure addresses are identical
- Online part based on !1720 (merged) so this other MR should be merged first, selection done by providing a run ID to the online binary
- default 2391 defaults to the 2022 parameters
- Tested with defaults and the first TS of
2391, gives, the same number of Digis but would need to be checked at the Digi level to make sure addresses are identical - Maybe could be used to switch the mSTS parameter file without needing to change some symbolic links
Edited by Pierre-Alain Loizeau
Merge request reports
Activity
added Online Parameters Reconstruction mCBM labels
requested review from @fweig
assigned to @p.-a.loizeau
Dear @d.smith, @fweig, @n.herrmann, @i.deppner, @f.uhlig, @s.lebedev, @p.-a.loizeau,
you have been identified as code owner of at least one file which was changed with this merge request.
Please check the changes and approve them or request changes.
added CodeOwners label
Just checked tracking results vs master. Looks fine (0.4% difference in found tracks).
I would aim to merge this after !1723 (merged).
added 4 commits
-
3b2e32f8...f4b749fb - 2 commits from branch
computing:master - 6582e692 - [mTOF] aadd unpack params support for mCBM 2024
- 6a7dd77f - [Online] Add support for mTOF 2024 mapping
-
3b2e32f8...f4b749fb - 2 commits from branch
-
@p.-a.loizeau, can we merge? CI is almost finished.
mentioned in merge request !1775 (merged)
Please register or sign in to reply