Add missing headers to installation directory

mentioned in merge request !1794 (merged)

added 1 commit

fa8f6507 - Apply clang-format

Compare with previous version

Dear @d.smith, @fweig, @f.uhlig, @v.friese, @p.-a.loizeau,

you have been identified as code owner of at least one file which was changed with this merge request.

Please check the changes and approve them or request changes.

added CodeOwners label

assigned to @f.uhlig

requested review from @v.friese

Assigned to @v.friese based on the central CMake changes but could be that @d.smith is more suited for reviewing this

added 7 commits

fa8f6507...82ab656f - 5 commits from branch computing:master
b829738b - Add missing headers to installation directory
5074310c - Apply clang-format

Compare with previous version

added 3 commits

e5216803 - Add missing headers to installation directory
fa8f6507 - Apply clang-format
c522e1cf - Merge branch 'missingheaderfix' of git.cbm.gsi.de:apuntke/cbmroot into missingheaderfix

Compare with previous version

added 6 commits

c522e1cf...49a1967f - 3 commits from branch computing:master
c0fa8675 - Add missing headers to installation directory
b45af711 - Apply clang-format
c08f99bc - Apply clang-format

Compare with previous version

added 23 commits

c08f99bc...429452b9 - 20 commits from branch computing:master
818486c7 - Add missing headers to installation directory
b06043b0 - Apply clang-format
1be56815 - Apply clang-format

Compare with previous version

resolved all threads

@v.friese,

could you please approve the MR such that we can proceed. For me the changes are fine.

added 23 commits

1be56815...712d0b65 - 20 commits from branch computing:master
9f505d4b - Add missing headers to installation directory
a996f6d6 - Apply clang-format
15b5a478 - Apply clang-format

Compare with previous version

added 4 commits

05191d25 - 1 commit from branch computing:master
c167f6a9 - Add missing headers to installation directory
7985e2b3 - Apply clang-format
1c17ac48 - Apply clang-format

Compare with previous version

added Build System label

I think the rebase conflicts came partially through the reformating of the full reco by @se.gorbunov and/or through the QA MRs of @s.zharko

Could one of you please have a look? It could be interesting to check if what @apuntke prepared here does not apply to more headers in the algo folder.
(of course we can also start be fixing this one, merging it and then make a further one for more headers)